Gomez-Garcia F, Ruano J, Aguilar-Luque Meters, Gay-Mimbrera J, Maestre-Lopez B, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Gonzalez-Padilla Meters, Velez Garcia-Nieto A beneficial, Isla-Tejera B
ninety days) between your last look big date and the full guide time. With this particular pointers, journals should think about asking for article authors regarding SRs to help you upgrade its books look till the greeting of the SRs. SR users also needs to figure out enough time lag amongst the history look date of one’s ratings so as that the data is up-to-day to have effective health-related decision-and come up with.
Sources
Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz G: Systematic recommendations into the medical care a functional publication. When you look at the. Cambridge: Cambridge School Force,; 2001: step 1 on line funding (148 p.).
Chalmers We. Section 24: using health-related reviews and you can documents away from constant examples for scientific and moral demo build, overseeing, and you may reporting. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, publishers. Medical product reviews when you look at the healthcare : meta-data in context. 2nd ed. London: BMJ; 2001. p. 42943.
Sutton AJ, Cooper Nj, Jones DR. Research synthesis as the the answer to significantly more coherent and you may productive search. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:31.
Beller EM, Chen JK, Wang UL, Glasziou PP. Try clinical recommendations upwards-to-day in the course of guide? Syst Rev. 2013;2:36.
Palese Good, Coletti S, Dante Good. Guide show among highest feeling basis medical journals during 2009: an excellent retrospective research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(4):54351.
Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y, Kimachi Meters, Shimizu S, Ikenoue T, Fukuma S, Yamamoto Y, sexy Cadiz women Fukuhara S. Majority of logical ratings had written within the high-perception publications didn’t register the latest standards: a beneficial meta-epidemiological research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;sixty.
Polkki T, Kanste O, Kaariainen Yards, Elo S, Kyngas H. The latest methodological quality of logical recommendations wrote for the large-effect breastfeeding guides: a peek at the books. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(34):315thirty-two.
Bath-Hextall F, Wharrad H, Leonardi-Bee J. Teaching gadgets from inside the evidence established behavior: evaluation regarding recyclable training stuff (RLOs) to own studying meta-investigation. BMC Med Educ. 2011;.
Shea Cock sucking, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, KristSTAR is a reliable and you can valid measurement equipment to evaluate this new methodological top-notch medical critiques. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):101320.
Riado Minguez D, Kowalski Meters, Vallve Odena Yards, Longin Pontzen D, Jelicic Kadic Good, Jeric Yards, Dosenovic S, Jakus D, Vrdoljak Meters, Poklepovic Pericic T, et al. Methodological and you may reporting quality of health-related product reviews blogged on higher ranking periodicals in neuro-scientific pain. Anesth Analg. 2017;
Samargandi OA, Hasan H. The caliber of systematic ratings at hand operations: an analysis playing with AMSTAR. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3):482e3e.
Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Jagannath Va, Sharif MO. An enthusiastic AMSTAR investigations of your own methodological quality of scientific product reviews out-of dental health care treatments authored on diary regarding applied dental research (JAOS). J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(5):440seven.
Scientific analysis and meta-analyses into the psoriasis: character away from money present, argument of interest and bibliometric indicator given that predictors off methodological top quality. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(6):163349.
Brandt JS, Downing Air-con, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST. Violation classics when you look at the obstetrics and gynecology: brand new 100 most frequently cited journal stuff during the last 50 ages. Was J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):355.e17.
Huang Y, Mao C, Yuan J, Yang Z, Di Meters, Tam WW, Tang J. Distribution and you may epidemiological characteristics out of authored private patient investigation meta-analyses. PLoS You to. 2014;9(6):e100151.
Tam WWS, Lo KKH. Khalechelvam P: Acceptance from PRISMA statement and you may quality of health-related analysis and you can meta-analyses penned inside the nursing publications: a corner-sectional study. BMJ Unlock. 2017;7(2):e013905.
Shea Blowjob, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers M, Andersson Letter, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai An excellent, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM. Additional recognition regarding a measurement device to evaluate clinical studies (AMSTAR). PLoS You to definitely. 2007;2(12):e1350.
Recent Comments